ANALYSIS_WARNING

Locked
shelby.paz
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:15 pm

ANALYSIS_WARNING

Post by shelby.paz » Tue Jun 02, 2020 6:12 pm

Hi, I work in a model of Timber frame and make different interactions in the nodes, used tree types of elements for each one with contact ZeroLength... and I can run the analysis
F.PNG
F.PNG (150.94 KiB) Viewed 3347 times
the columns and beams work with polylines because in each node I put some mass
F1.PNG
F1.PNG (22.21 KiB) Viewed 3347 times
but when I run the analysis for the pushover analysis give an error, I can found these
F3.PNG
F3.PNG (40.39 KiB) Viewed 3347 times
Why I have this type o error??
I add the file because I can't understand what is wrong
M_ROMANIAsimplified.zip
(165.95 KiB) Downloaded 244 times
Thank you

STKO Team
Posts: 3066
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: ANALYSIS_WARNING

Post by STKO Team » Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:58 am

dear User,
Unless you need interactions for specific conditions and/or properties (for example rigid link), we suggest to merge elements of the models. You can select elements you need to merge and then click on the merge button under the geometry tab. You still have single geometries and you can see on the list under the work tree, but you do not need a lot of interactions. Also, in this case we think it is better to add zerolenght on elements instead of nodes.
We fix some of this issues on the attach model.
We suggest to check the applied load because there are large deformations.
Please, let us know if you need any help.
Have a nice day.
Attachments
M_ROMANIAsimplified.7z
(102.41 KiB) Downloaded 254 times
Last edited by STKO Team on Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

shelby.paz
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:15 pm

Re: ANALYSIS_WARNING

Post by shelby.paz » Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:07 pm

thank you very much for the recommendations....

shelby.paz
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:15 pm

Re: ANALYSIS_WARNING

Post by shelby.paz » Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:17 am

STKO Team wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:58 am
dear User,
Unless you need interactions for specific conditions and/or properties (for example rigid link), we suggest to merge elements of the models. You can select elements you need to merge and then d click on the merge button under the geometry tab. You still have single geometries and you can see on the list under the work tree, but you do not need a lot of interactions. Also, in this case we think it is better to add zerolenght on elements instead of nodes.
We fix some of this issues on the attach model.
We suggest to check the applied load because there are large deformations.
Please, let us know if you need any help.
Have a nice day.
I saw the correction you made in the file, but the question is, you work only with one interaction, and the other types of connection disappear, or when you merge the lines are assumed with the geometry? I try to replicate your steps but, I continue with the problems, how is possible to work with different properties in the nodes of union between beams and columns?

STKO Team
Posts: 3066
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: ANALYSIS_WARNING

Post by STKO Team » Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:58 pm

dear User,
when you merge geometry connection are assumed wth geometry, so we add the only interaction necessary in your model case.
As shown in the attacched images, we didn't assign the properties on nodes, but on the interaction. It is possible to add more condition on the same geometry (as well as on the same interaction), but only one physical or element property.
Please, let us know if you need anything else.
Have a nice day.
Attachments
photo5965234521152533364.jpg
photo5965234521152533364.jpg (367.65 KiB) Viewed 3318 times

Locked