running error

Post Reply
[email protected]
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:02 pm

running error

Post by [email protected] » Mon Mar 21, 2022 1:36 am

Hello,
The RC shear wall was established in the
220321.zip
(209.68 KiB) Downloaded 376 times
. When submitting, the running error in the command boxImage.
Waiting for your reply.
Attachments
running question.jpg
running question.jpg (52.17 KiB) Viewed 6075 times

STKO Team
Posts: 3070
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: running error

Post by STKO Team » Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:38 am

It's because you are trying to run a parallel analysis with OpenSeesMP without a partition.
Remember to call the Partition command after the BuildMesh command if you want to use OpenSeesMP

[email protected]
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:02 pm

Re: running error

Post by [email protected] » Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:13 pm

Thank you for your reply. It is successful.
In my model, I hope there are only horizontal and vertical displacement (Ux and Uz) at the top position. So rotations in three directions (Rx, Ry and Rz) and out-of-plane displacement (Uy) at the top position (the red line in the picture Image) were fixed. However, model results in the Post Processor show that the rotation (Ry) generated at the top of the wall Image.
Wait for your reply.
Attachments
2022-03-21_164925.jpg
2022-03-21_164925.jpg (75.76 KiB) Viewed 6065 times
2022-03-21_165220.jpg
2022-03-21_165220.jpg (156.65 KiB) Viewed 6065 times

STKO Team
Posts: 3070
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: running error

Post by STKO Team » Tue Mar 22, 2022 9:52 am

Here's the working file:
wall-mine-220318.zip
(181.03 KiB) Downloaded 378 times
The in-plane rotation in shells is not like the out-of-plane rotation.
It does not represent the rigid body rotation, but a deformational rotation also called drilling rotation. It is something related to the Cosserat continuum theory.

If you want to fix the in-plane RIGID BODY rotation of a shell you need to:

Release the deformational rotation Ry:
fix_inplane_rot_1.png
fix_inplane_rot_1.png (57.4 KiB) Viewed 6041 times
Add an interaction to impose the same displacement in Z. Since the rigid body rotation about Y consists in a skew-symmetric displacement in Z (+ on the right, - on the left), the equal DOF in Z will constrain the rigid body rotation:
fix_inplane_rot_2.png
fix_inplane_rot_2.png (65.68 KiB) Viewed 6041 times
This is what you get:
fix_inplane_rot_1.png
fix_inplane_rot_1.png (57.4 KiB) Viewed 6041 times
Attachments
fix_inplane_rot_3.png
fix_inplane_rot_3.png (106.03 KiB) Viewed 6041 times

[email protected]
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:02 pm

Re: running error

Post by [email protected] » Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:16 pm

Thank you. It is succeed.
Because the in-plane rotation of top was not fully constrained in the test, the stiffness of hysteresis curves is smller. If the top can rotate at a small angle, how to set the condition of the top? It maybe reduce the stiffness of hysteresis curves in simulation. And I think it is a little unreasonable to adjust the elastic modulus of material propertyies and size of model for reduce of stiffness.

STKO Team
Posts: 3070
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: running error

Post by STKO Team » Mon Apr 04, 2022 10:48 am

The boundary condition I suggested is for a shear-type condition, so no rotation on top.
If instead, the experimental setup allows rotation, you need to use a different condition. Could you please explain in detail the experimental setup for the top boundary?

Post Reply