Search found 2068 matches
- Thu Nov 23, 2023 2:04 pm
- Forum: OpenSees Sequential
- Topic: RE; additional information on SSPbrick up element.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 256
Re: RE; additional information on SSPbrick up element.
Could you share your file to have a look?
- Thu Nov 23, 2023 1:59 pm
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: A huge vertical acceleration
- Replies: 2
- Views: 60
Re: A huge vertical acceleration
Try this with the new absorbing boundary elements.
Note: here the time series for the base action should be exactly the velocity
Note: here the time series for the base action should be exactly the velocity
- Thu Nov 23, 2023 10:54 am
- Forum: Get Started Discussion
- Topic: Masonry example without fully postproces
- Replies: 12
- Views: 273
Re: Masonry example without fully postproces
The error is saying that you forgot to:
https://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/inde ... e_Recorder
- Add the node or list of nodes
- Add the dof
- Add the result
https://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/inde ... e_Recorder
- Tue Nov 21, 2023 11:13 am
- Forum: OpenSees MP
- Topic: Designsafe - OpenseesMP option
- Replies: 3
- Views: 296
Re: Designsafe - OpenseesMP option
you're welcome
- Tue Nov 21, 2023 11:12 am
- Forum: OpenSees Sequential
- Topic: RE; additional information on SSPbrick up element.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 256
Re: RE; additional information on SSPbrick up element.
I have a query regarding whether there is an inherent mass damping included in the analysis when the mass is provided. No damping is automatically used by OpenSees. You have do explicitly include damping Specifically, my question is about the interpretation of these body forces. Do they correspond ...
- Tue Nov 21, 2023 11:05 am
- Forum: Post processing and data visualization
- Topic: RE:Post processing visualization of stresses and integration points
- Replies: 7
- Views: 251
Re: RE:Post processing visualization of stresses and integration points
The last components in the stress result are useful stress invariants computed on-the-fly by STKO.
Instead, the pressure in the nodal result is the fluid pressure for U-P elements
Instead, the pressure in the nodal result is the fluid pressure for U-P elements
- Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:07 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Coupled RC Core Wall with MVLEM-3D
- Replies: 91
- Views: 10497
Re: Coupled RC Core Wall with MVLEM-3D
This is the script for the section cut: SectionCut.zip Now we are implementing it directly in STKO to make it more efficient and user-friendly. But in the meantime, you can use this. Note: Run the analysis asking for "force" result (i.e. forces at the element's nodes). They are necessary to compute ...
- Mon Nov 20, 2023 9:45 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Curved Beam With Fiber Section
- Replies: 5
- Views: 167
Re: Curved Beam With Fiber Section
Yes only uniaxial materials
- Mon Nov 20, 2023 9:43 am
- Forum: Get Started Discussion
- Topic: Masonry example without fully postproces
- Replies: 12
- Views: 273
Re: Masonry example without fully postproces
By the way, because of the inconvenience of extracting chart data in postprocessor, I decide to output data by tcl commands. However, If I run the parallel model, the data files only contain a part of the data rather than the complete content. Is there any way to record the complete data in one fil...
- Wed Nov 08, 2023 4:38 pm
- Forum: Interaction
- Topic: Spring-dashpot coupling in 2 directions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1509
Re: Spring-dashpot coupling in 2 directions
Let's see if this works: There is a command in OpenSees that is not documented. It's called equalDOF_Mixed , it's like the standard equalDOF, but you can couple a DOF (for example UX) to another (for example UY). Format: equalDOFmixed RnodeID? CnodeID? numDOF? RDOF1? CDOF1? ... ... RnodeID = master ...