asdeasoft.net

Try this:
https://asdea.eu/software/advanced-e-learning-courses/

Webinar #10: Nonlinear Analysis of an existing RC building including RC joint modeling

It looks like the initStrain material has an issue with the number of components it gives as output. Use the initStress instead (using an initial stress equal to your initial strain times the young's modulus): IS.png This has the same result as long as the init strain is less than the yield strain (...

It can be done, but it really depends on what you want to do. For example: Is it a huge model for which you need parallel analysis? In this case, you want to press run only once, and sequentially run all N ground motions (one after the other), with each analysis running in parallel (domain decomposi...

Please send and e-mail to info@asdeasoft.net and set up a quick call to see what the problem is

Yes now you can do it like this.

> Is it ok to specify masses via both node forces and line masses. I assumed that the gravity analysis will only take the masses( specified as node forces) and TH Analysis will only take the line masses automatically. Am i correct for this assumption? The "weight" must be modelled as a force (other...

Not yet

You have a concrete material that does not have a final residual plateau in compression and at the same time a steel material that fractures. Under certain conditions, it will simply completely fail and there is no way you can compute equilibrium anymore

This is strange!

What do you mean by " the program does not run the same way"?

I was wondering if the syntax of the setParameter random table is the same than the RandomizedMaterial Wrapper table. I was using something like this. Will it work? Will it work on parallel? The elements are SSPQUADup Yes, it uses the same format. The issue is that in OpenSees, the PDMY02 does not ...